data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25eae/25eaec529cc0139a45664eb6dc23e9b1f0d03475" alt="DSC_3404"
Yay columbines - I'm always kind of surprised when they emerge, because the foliage is usually buried under a pile of faster-growing, more aggressive plants.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/325a2/325a2033a2d32ded9e91f330829f6c69ee39325d" alt="after the rain"
some sort of daisy - I don't know the name, but I sure wish we had more. They're so showy and neon like, they almost seem fake. And of course, the bleeding hearts are blooming prolifically. I look forward to these every year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49b28/49b28ebf552ca00847036a65ad6b3e231e992be9" alt="dropped"
the back spurs of a columbine, in macro:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e78b/6e78b1dced0596d7b79fb817fca22cffc2912a00" alt="DSC_3449"
I have been playing stupid camera tricks again, as in this earlier post about free-lensing. The above macro is the result of holding the 50mm prime backwards against the camera body, without a mount or protection for the rear element. Suggesting this has elicited cries of horror on other boards, and despite the fact that I recently had to clean dust off my sensor (not as a result of free lens or reverse macro - more from changing lenses on a dusty bus in Turkey), I can't resist doing it again anyway. I actually do have a very nice macro lens - a non-metering 55mm/3.5 Nikkor, but the ability to just whip your lens off and turn it around - well, I just think that's cool.
Using the free lens the right way around - the rear element held towards the camera body, but not mounted, allows a bit of light leak. I'm trying to get a lensbaby-ish effect, but didn't quite succeed this time. Still, I like doing it, and I like the unpredictability of it, and indeed, lack of control.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ec/dc7ececc9106e165e2874e72feac0d541ffa7e90" alt="DSC_3435"
I can totally understand why people find the idea of a loose, unprotected lens reckless. But I like experimenting, and really, I am not careless with my things; most of my possessions last decades, and I take good care of them. But I like to use them, even if it means using them in ways the manual might warn you against, and sometimes, just because I can.
1 comment:
Yes. It's a fun trick. I played with it quite a bit a few years ago. Some of my favorite flower pics were shot with the backwards lens trick.
Post a Comment